Special Geometries in Mathematical Physics
Weak Mirror Symmetry of Nilmanifolds R. Cleyton, J. Lauret, Y.S. Poon
April 3, Kuhlungsborn.
Overview
Motivation
Differential Gerstenhaber algebras (DGA) (Complex structures, symplectic structures) Nilmanifolds.
Real 4-dimension as example.
Results in 6-dimension.
Algebraic structure: semi-direct product.
Geometric structure: special Lagrangian, torsion-free flat connections.
Motivation
Differential Gerstenhaber algebras (DGA) (Complex structures, symplectic structures) Nilmanifolds.
Real 4-dimension as example.
Results in 6-dimension.
Algebraic structure: semi-direct product.
Geometric structures: special Lagrangian, torsion-free flat connections.
DGA, Differential Gerstenhaber Algebras. 1958
a=⊕n∈Zan a graded algebra.
An associative product∧
A graded commutative product [−,−]
A differentiald of degree +1.
I (a,∧,d), graded (differential) associative algebra;
I (a,[−,−],d), odd (differential) graded Lie algebra;
I ∧ and bracket [−,−] an odd distributive rule:
[a,b∧c] = [a,b]∧c+ (−1)(dega+1) degbb∧[a,c].
The cohomology ofd, a Gerstenhaber algebra.
DGA(a,∧,[−,−],d)≈DGA(b,•,{−,−}, δ)
quasi-isomorphic if and only if aDGAhomomorphism induces (Hd∗,∧,[−,−])∼= (Hδ∗,•,{−,−}) isomorphism.
DGA(M , J )
(M,J) a complex manifold. DGA(M,J).
∧∗(T(1,0)M⊕T∗(0,1)M), ∧exterior product.
[X,Y] Lie bracket. [X, α] =LXα. [α, β] = 0.
∂, the usual ∂-operator.
Remark: Maurer-Cartan equation. ∂Γ +12[Γ,Γ] = 0.
The cohomology
H1 =H0(M,Θ)⊕H1(M,O).
Holomorphic tangent sheaf Θ. Structure sheafO.
H2 =H0(M,∧2Θ)⊕H1(M,Θ)⊕H2(M,O).
Classical: (1,1). Generalized: (0,2)+(2,0).
Extended: everything else.
DGA(N , ω)
(N, ω) a symplectic manifold. DGA(N, ω).
∧∗(T∗M), ∧exterior product.
[α, β]ω :=ω[ω−1α, ω−1β]. ω:TM →T∗M d, exterior differential. Complexification.
Cohomology: De Rham (coefficients in complex numbers) (M,J) and (N, ω) is a weak mirror pair if
DGA(M,J)≈DGA(N, ω) Merkulov (2002)
Nilmanifolds
M := Γ\H.
H simply connected, nilpotent.
Γ, co-compact lattice.
Example. Torus.
Kodaira-Thurston
T2,→M −→T2.
The algebra:
h=he1,e2,e3i ⊕ he4i, [e1,e2] =−e3. Dual equation:
de3 =e1∧e2, (0,0,12,0)
DGA(k, ω) and DGA(h, J )
bΓ\K, invariant symplectic structure ω.
DGA(k, ω) := (∧∗k∗,∧,[−,−]ω,d).
Nomizu (1958): HDR∗ (bΓ\K)∼=Hd∗(h∗) or
DGA(bΓ\K, ω)≈DGA(k, ω).
Γ\H, invariant J.
DGA(h,J) := (∧•h(1,0)⊕h∗(0,1),∧,[−,−], ∂).
Rollenske (2007), after Fino, ..., Poon:
Often,
DGA(Γ\H,J)≈DGA(h,J).
The Issue
Find pseudo-K¨ahlerian (h,J, ω) and (bh,ω,b bJ) such that DGA(h,J)≈DGA(bh,ω),b DGA(h, ω)≈DGA(bh,bJ) dimRh= dimRk.
handk are nilpotent.
pseudo-K¨ahler
Hasegawa. Benson-Gordon. More than twenty years ago.
Very low dimension
dimRh= 2. No kidding.
dimRh= 4. There is a choice: trivial or non-trivial.
On Kodaira-Thurston ”surface”,
DGA(M,Kodaira’sJ)≈DGA(M,Thurston’s ω).
(Poon 2006 in Crelle) Proof:
DGA(M, ω)≈DGA(h, ω).(Nomizu’s) DGA(M,J)≈DGA(h,J).
A spectral sequence computation over elliptic fibrations.
T2,→M −→T2. Do the algebra by hands.
Find the isomorphism by eyes.
Six-dimensional
Classifications.
Symplectic structures (Goze-Khakimdjanov, 1996) A table.
Complex structures (Salamon, 2001) Another table.
Pseudo-K¨ahlerian nilpotent algebra. (Cordero, Fernandez, Ugarte, 2006) Yet another table.
Task: IdentifyDGA(h,J) up to (quasi-)isomorphism when dimRh= 6,J is pseudo-K¨ahlerian.
Step 1. Nilpotence =⇒ quasi-isomorphic if and only if isomorphic.
Step 2. DGA(h,J) = Λ•(h(1,0)⊕h∗(0,1)).
f1 :=h(1,0)⊕h∗(0,1). A Lie algebra.
Identify this Lie algebra.
Step 3. Compute allf1 for all such (h,J), by finding appropriate
”invariants” from the structure equations.
Even more tables. (AJM with R. Cleyton)
g\f1(g,J) h1 h3 h4 h6 h7 h8 h9 h10 h11 h17
h1 X
h2 X X
h3 X
h4 X X
h5 X X X
h6 X
h7 X
h8 X
h9 X
h10 X
h11 X
h12 X
h13 X
h14 X
h15 X X X X X X X
h16 X
Algebra vs geometry, back to general theory
Special Lagrangian geometry.
T3,→M →B3. Totally real. Lagrangian.
T3∗
,→Mb →B3. Same.
On algebra level. Semi-direct product
Abelian ideal and subalgebra. h=gnV.g→End(V) Dual semi-direct product. bh=gnV∗.
0→V →h→g→0. 0→V∗→bh→g→0.
Semi-direct product also appears in f1 :=h(1,0)⊕h∗(0,1),
[h(1,0),h(1,0)]⊆h(1,0), [h(1,0),h∗(0,1)]⊆h∗(0,1),[h∗(0,1),h∗(0,1)] ={0}.
h(1,0) sub-algebra. h∗(0,1) abelian ideal.
J ⇒ ω, b ω ⇒ b J
Given (gnV,J, ω), pseudo-K¨ahler.
getgnV∗. Find (bJ,ω) pseudo-K¨b ahler.
(Fukuya 1999, Ben-Bassat 2006)
h=gnV, J =⇒bh=gnV∗, ωb ? Given Jg=V, JV =g.
Defineω(Xb , α) :=α(JX), X ∈g, α∈V∗.
k=gnW, ω =⇒bk=gnW∗, bJ ? Givenω :g→W∗. ω−1 :W∗ →g.
DefinebJ(X) =ω(X), bJ(α) :=−ω−1(α) X ∈g, α ∈W∗.
The isomorphism
(gnV,J) =⇒(gnV∗,ω) =b ⇒(gnV,J).
(gnV, ω) =⇒(gnV∗,bJ) =⇒(gnV, ω).
Wanted:
DGA(gnV,J)∼=DGA(gnV∗,ω)b DGA(gnV, ω)∼=DGA(gnV∗,bJ) That is to find a homomorphism
φ:DGA(gnV∗,ω)b →DGA(gnV,J)
i.e. φ: (gnV∗)C →(gnV)(1,0)⊕(gnV)∗(0,1) Explicitly,φ(X +α) := (1−iJ)X+ (1−iJ)α.
Construction of J, ω in our context
Given the general theory, do it on six-dimensional nilpotent algebras.
1. Construct all six-dimensional pseudo-K¨ahler (gnV, J).
2. Find (gnV∗, ω).b
Step 1. Lie theoretic computation of all possible semi-direct products.
Step 2. Lie theoretic computation of all dual semi-direct products.
Step 3. Impose geometric condition to identify compatible algebraic structures.
That is to start from algebra to geometry.
Alternative: Yoga
Begin with the geometric requirement, find the algebras on h=gnρV.
Given J, totally real. γ(X)Y :=−Jρ(X)JY.
Linear mapγ :g→End(g). Make a connection. ∇XY =γ(X)Y, forX,Y ∈g.
Totally real, integrable↔ torsion-free, flat connection overg.
Givenω, Lagrangian. Makeγ(X)Y :=ω−1ρ∗(X)ω(Y).
Lagrangian, symplectic↔ torsion-free, flat connection overg.
Special Lagrangian↔ both γ and γ∗ are torsion free, flat.
Results, Tables after tables
Special Lagrangian semi-direct product six-dimensional nilpotent algebras:
h1, h4 = (0,0,0,0,12,14 + 23),h7= (0,0,0,12,13,23), h8 = (0,0,0,0,0,12), h9 = (0,0,0,0,12,14 + 25), h10= (0,0,0,12,13,14), h11= (0,0,0,12,13,14 + 23).
The mirror pairs:
(h,J, ω) h1 h4 h7 h8 h9 h10 h11 (bh,bω,bJ) h1 h7 h4 h8 h9 h10 h11 Self mirror onh1,h8,h9,h10.
Onh11, same space, different geometry.
h4 andh7 form a non-trivial pair.
That’s all, folks!
Any questions?
What about solvable?
Work in progress. 33.333% done. K¨ahlerian