The role of postmortem biochemical and structural The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes and possible relationship to postnatal
changes and possible relationship to postnatal growth
growth
Giuseppe Bee Giuseppe Bee
Agroscope
Agroscope Liebefeld Liebefeld - - Posieux Posieux , Research Station ALP , Research Station ALP
Water
Water - - holding holding capacity capacity of of meat meat : :
Why is minimizing drip loss important Why is minimizing drip loss important
- - costumer expects good pork quality costumer expects good pork quality
- small variability in quality
- pork should be consistently tender and juicy
- - what do we observe? what do we observe?
- results from ALP studies
muscles N drip loss
(after 24 h) minimum maximum standard deviation
longissimus muscle 604 4.82% 4.82% 1.10% 13.91% 3.08%
semitendinosus muscle 313 2.91% 2.91% 0.92% 11.18% 1.81%
biceps femoris 33 4.32% 4.32% 1.38% 9.61% 1.93%
rectus femoris 223 1.85% 1.85% 0.88% 5.90% 0.80%
semimembranosus muscle 33 5.22% 5.22% 2.22% 13.34% 2.51%
Location of water in the muscle Location of water in the muscle
- - Lean muscle contains 75% of water Lean muscle contains 75% of water
- - Majority of the water within the structure of the Majority of the water within the structure of the muscle cells
muscle cells
- Within the myofibrils (~ 85% of the water) - Between the myofibrils
- Between the myofibrils and the sarcolemma - Between myofibers
- Between muscle bundles
- - Bound Bound water water
- 0.5 g water/g protein Æ 1 / 8 of total water
- - Entrapped Entrapped (immobilized) (immobilized) water water
- held by steric effects and/or by attraction to bound water
- - Free Free water water
- water whose flow from the tissue is unimpeded
3 possible forms of water in the muscle 3 possible forms of water in the muscle
Majority of this water affects Majority of this water affects
DRIP LOSS DRIP LOSS
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Watermolecule.png
Drip loss
Drip loss - - cascade of events (part 1) cascade of events (part 1)
glycogen
lactic acid
meat pH pH drops
conversion of conversion of muscle to meat muscle to meat
approaching approaching protein
protein pI p I
(p ( pI I of myosin = 5.4) of myosin = 5.4)
net charge of net charge of proteins = 0
proteins = 0
+ ++ + - -
- -
+ +
+ + - -
- -
+ +
+ + - -
- -
+ +
+ + - -
- -
+ +
+ + - -
- -
O HH
Reduced
Reduced space space within within the the myofibril myofibril Shrinkage
Shrinkage of of myofibrillar lattice myofibrillar lattice
O HH
Drip loss
Drip loss - - cascade of events (part 2) cascade of events (part 2)
Shortening of
Shortening of sarcomere sarcomere
Clark et al., 2002
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18:637-706
higher proportion of water higher proportion of water
in the
in the I I- -band band
Postmortem proteolysis Postmortem proteolysis
relationship to drip loss
3 h pm 3 h pm
6 h pm 6 h pm
9 h pm 9 h pm
24 h pm 24 h pm 3 h pm
3 h pm
6 h pm 6 h pm
9 h pm 9 h pm
24 h pm 24 h pm
Lawson, 2004 Meat Sci. 68:559-566
no no
proteolysis proteolysis proteolysis
proteolysis
Cell shrinkage and drip loss Cell shrinkage and drip loss
Schäfer et al., 2002 Meat Sci. 61:355-366
extrafascicular extrafascicular area area extrafibre
extrafibre area area
variation in
variation in extrafascicular extrafascicular area area accounted for 39% accounted for 39% of of variation in drip loss
variation in drip loss variation in
variation in extrafiber extrafiber area area accounted for
accounted for 46% 46% of variation of variation in drip loss
in drip loss
Calpain system Calpain system
major role in regulating proteolysis of muscle major role in regulating proteolysis of muscle proteins under postmortem conditions
proteins under postmortem conditions
2 major isoforms
(best characterized)μ- μ -calpain calpain
m m -calpain - calpain
degrade the same set of proteins
calpastatin calpastatin
Goll et al., 2003 Physiol. Rev. 83:731-801
μ μ - - calpain and postmortem proteolysis calpain and postmortem proteolysis
μ- μ -calpain calpain
m- m -calpain calpain
desmin desmin
Geesink et al., 2006 J. Anim. Sci. 84:2834-2840
μ- μ -calpain calpain
80 kDa
78 kDa
76 kDa
h postmortem
1 6 12 24
pH
5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6
LM PM SM
h postmortem
1 6 12 24
°C
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
LM PM
Differences among muscles
SMDifferences among muscles
h postmortem
0.5 0.8 1.0
pH
5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6
Melody et al., 2004 J. Anim. Sci. 82:1195-1205
LM LM SM SM PM PM
80 kDa
μ μ - - calpain autolysis calpain autolysis
45 min 45 min
Melody et al., 2004 J. Anim. Sci. 82:1195-1205
80 kDa 78 kDa
80 kDa 78 kDa 76 kDa
LM LM SM SM PM PM Western-blot Casein zymography
24 h
24 h
6 h 6 h
Titin and nebulin Titin and nebulin
Clark et al., 2002
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18:637-706
Localization of
Localization of μ μ - - calpain calpain
LM LM SM SM PM PM
80 kDa
80 kDa 78 kDa
80 kDa 78 kDa 76 kDa
Bright bands in the immunofluorescent images indicate where μ-calpain
monoclonal antibodies were located.
Fluorescent image
Phase-contrast image
Melody et al., 2004 J. Anim. Sci. 82:1195-1205
24 h 24 h
6 h 6 h
45 min
45 min
Drip loss and desmin degradation Drip loss and desmin degradation
Drip loss
24 h 96 h
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5% LM
PM SM
relative abundance of the
desmin degradation product
postmortem
0.75 h 6 h 24 h
relative abundance
0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65
LM PM SM
Melody et al., 2004 J. Anim. Sci. 82:1195-1205
Intermediate filament protein
Intermediate filament protein - - desmin desmin
Clark et al., 2002
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18:637-706
pH decline and drip loss pH decline and drip loss
pH decline
minutes postmortem
45 180 360 1440
45 180 360 1440
pH
5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2
6.4 H-pH
L-pH
Drip loss
day after storage
0 1 2 5
0 1 2 5
0 1 2 5
0 1 2 5
drip loss
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
H-pH L-pH
Bee et al., 2007 Meat Sci. 76:359-365
Loin samples selected at this time point
drip loss (d of storage)
-0.49
-0.49 -0.51 -0.51
pH 2 5
pearson
pearson correlation coefficients correlation coefficients
45 min 45 min
-0.56
-0.56 -0.60 -0.60 6 h 6 h
-0.62
-0.62 -0.75 -0.75
24 h 24 h
Proteolysis and drip loss Proteolysis and drip loss
day of storage
H-pH
L-pH
desmin
desmin immunoblots immunoblots
0 1 2 5
Intact desmin degradation
day after storage
0 1 2 5
Relative abundance of intact desmin (%)
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
H-pH L-pH
degradation of desmin degradation of desmin
Bee et al., 2007 Meat Sci. 76:359-365
drip loss (d of storage)
0.41 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.42 0.42
1 2 5
pearson
pearson correlation coefficients correlation coefficients
Proteolysis and drip loss Proteolysis and drip loss
degradation of talin degradation of talin
intact talin degradation
day after storage
0 1 2 5
Relative abundance of intact talin (%)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
H-pH L-pH
day of storage
H-pH
L-pH
talin
talin immunoblots immunoblots
0 1 2 5
Bee et al., 2007 Meat Sci. 76:359-365
drip loss (d of storage)
0.35 0.35 0.60 0.60 0.51 0.51
1 2 5
pearson
pearson correlation coefficients correlation coefficients
Costameric protein
Costameric protein - - talin talin
Clark et al., 2002
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18:637-706
Intermediate filament protein
Intermediate filament protein - - vinculin vinculin
Clark et al., 2002
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18:637-706
intact vinculin degradation
day after storage
0 1 2 5
Relative abundance of intact vinculin (%)
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
H-pH L-pH
Proteolysis and drip loss Proteolysis and drip loss
autolysis of
autolysis of μ μ- -calpain calpain
μ-calpain subunit
(80 kDa) andits
large subunit autolysis
products (78 and 76 kDa)80 kDa 78 kDa 76 kDa
relative abundance
0 20 40 60 80 100
H-pH L-pH
H H -pH - pH L- L -pH pH
80 kDa 78 kDa 76 kDa
0.45 0.48 0.59
desmin talin drip loss
(1 d)
pearson
pearson correlation coefficients correlation coefficients
80 kDa
0.59 0.73 0.58
78 kDa
-0.57
-0.57 -0.66 -0.66 -0.63 -0.63
76 kDa
Cytoskeletal
Cytoskeletal attachment and drip loss attachment and drip loss
Lawson, 2004 Meat Sci. 68:559-566
Intermediate filament protein
Intermediate filament protein - - integrin integrin
Clark et al., 2002
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18:637-706
Cytoskeletal
Cytoskeletal attachment and drip loss attachment and drip loss
low drip loss
high drip loss
3 h 6 h 9 h 24 h
Lawson, 2004 Meat Sci. 68:559-566
Cytoskeletal
Cytoskeletal attachment and drip loss attachment and drip loss
β β- -integrin integrin cytoplasmic
cytoplasmic domains domains
m- m -calpain calpain
coco--localization of localization of β
β--integrin integrin
&
&
mm--calpaincalpain
Prerigor Rigor
Prerigor Rigor
Lawson, 2004 Meat Sci. 68:559-566
Integrin degradation and drip loss Integrin degradation and drip loss
Zhang, 2006 Meat Sci. 74:578-585
Relative abundance of intact integrin
(LM)
0.5 h 24 h 72 h
relative abundance
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
1.8 Small litter Large litter
LS; P = 0.08 BtW; P = 0.65 LS x BtW; P = 0.33
Large
Large litter litter Small litter Small litter
0.5 h 24 h 72 h
Relative abundance of intact integrin
(STD)
0.5 h 24 h 72 h
relative abundance
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
1.8 Small litter Large litter
Proteolysis of integrin Proteolysis of integrin
relative abundance relative abundance of intact integrin of intact integrin Drip loss
Drip loss 0.5 h 0.5 h 24 h 24 h 72 h 72 h
LM LM - - 0.12 0.12 - - 0.34 0.34 -0.16 - 0.16
STD STD 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.16 - - 0.31 0.31
Relationship between drip loss and postnatal Relationship between drip loss and postnatal
growth growth
- - Differing growth rate induced by specific feeding Differing growth rate induced by specific feeding strategies might affect proteolysis?
strategies might affect proteolysis?
greater proteolysis
less proteolysis
higher μ-calpain activity
higher μ-calpain:calpastatin ratio
Thaw loss
%
8 9 10 11 12
13 AA
RA RR
Kristensen et al., 2002 J. Anim. Sci. 80:2862-2871
μ μ - - calpain activity calpain activity
μ-calpain activity
(casein zymography)
hours postmortem
0.5 24.0
S tandardized cont our quant it y
0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
AA RA RR
P-values
Feeding regimen: 0.03 Birth weight: 0.86 Time postmortem: < 0.01
μ-calpain m-calpain
AA AA RA R A RR RR AA AA RA R A RR RR
LM after 48 h
Feeding strategy
AA RA RR
Drip loss, %
1 3 5 7
LM
Feeding strategy
AA RA RR
Shear force values, kg
0.0 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4
ab
a
b
Lean growth efficiency and drip loss Lean growth efficiency and drip loss
pH decline
minutes postmortem
15 30 45 1440
pH
5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8
control selected
Lonergan et al, 2004 Meat Sci. 68:559-566