• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Topology of the European Network of Earth Observation Networks and the need for an European Network of Networks

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Topology of the European Network of Earth Observation Networks and the need for an European Network of Networks"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 18, EGU2016-8294, 2016 EGU General Assembly 2016

© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Topology of the European Network of Earth Observation Networks and the need for an European Network of Networks

Joan Masó (1), Ivette Serral (1), Ian McCallum (2), Palma Blonda (3), and Hans-Peter Plag (4)

(1) CREAF, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain, (2) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. IIASA. Laxenburg, Austria., (3) Institute of Intelligent Systems for Automation, National Research Council ISSIA CNR, Bari, Italy, (4) Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA

ConnectinGEO (Coordinating an Observation Network of Networks EnCompassing saTellite and IN-situ to fill the Gaps in European Observations” is an H2020 Coordination and Support Action with the primary goal of linking existing Earth Observation networks with science and technology (S&T) communities, the industry sector, the Group on Earth Observations (GEO), and Copernicus. The project will end in February 2017.

ConnectinGEO will initiate a European Network of Earth Observation Networks (ENEON) that will en- compass space-based, airborne and in-situ observations networks. ENEON will be composed of project partners representing thematic observation networks along with the GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Network, GEO Communities of Practices, Copernicus services, Sentinel missions and in-situ support data representatives, representatives of the European space-based, airborne and in-situ observations networks.

This communication presents the complex panorama of Earth Observations Networks in Europe. The list of networks is classified by discipline, variables, geospatial scope, etc. We also capture the membership and relations with other networks and umbrella organizations like GEO. The result is a complex interrelation between networks that can not be clearly expressed in a flat list.

Technically the networks can be represented as nodes with relations between them as lines connecting the nodes in a graph. We have chosen RDF as a language and an AllegroGraph 3.3 triple store that is visualized in several ways using for example Gruff 5.7.

Our final aim is to identify gaps in the EO Networks and justify the need for a more structured coordina- tion between them.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

of investments depends on the utility loss from foregone consumption (because the time devoted to social interaction reduces the time spent on working), and on the utility gain

At first glance, the egocentric networks of actors with strong ties to EASO show that, contrary to the assumption, all four actors (MHAS Malta, UNHCR Italy, IOM Italy and Cruz

MDs, medical students, clinical and health psychologists, psychotherapists, nurses, physicians, HR personnel Sleep and dream researchers and experts,

The Earth Watch missions are designed to provide Earth observation data for services, including those of the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological

lar vis-a-vis ESA. Attached to ASA is the above mentioned national Remote Sensing Working Group AGFE comprised of every one interested in the topic. Recently chairmanship

From this purpose the following requirements can be derived: The model must be responsive to changes in European transport policy, in particular to different

The main result for a network society such that the profile of utility functions satisfies convexity in own links and the strategic complements property is that there always exists

One of the reasons for this seems to be that many network coordinators and partners do not have a sufficiently clear picture of the concept of a network as a specific