• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

, simulated sampling is black and the observed is red.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie ", simulated sampling is black and the observed is red."

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Supplementary files

Figure S1. Observed and simulated monthly ET

0

, runoff and precipitation from April to September

0 20 40

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Precipitat ion in Apr.(mm) Runoff in Apr.(108 m3)

0.4 0.6 0.8

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Runoff in Mar.(108 m3) Runoff in Apr.(108 m3)

0 20 40

100 120 140 160

Precipit ation in Apr.(mm)

ET0 in Apr.(mm)

50 100

100 120 140 160

ET 0 in Mar.(mm)

ET0 in Apr.(mm)

0.4 0.6 0.8

0 20 40

Runoff in Mar.(108 m3)

Precipitation in Apr.(mm)

50 100

0 20 40

ET 0 in Mar.(mm)

Precipitation in Apr.(mm)

0 20 40 60

0.5 1 1.5 2

Precipitation in May (mm) Runoff in May (108 m3)

0.5 1

0.5 1 1.5 2

Runoff in Apr.(108 m3) Runoff in May (108 m3)

0 20 40 60

100 120 140 160 180

Precipitation in May (mm)

ET0 in May (mm)

100 150

100 120 140 160 180

ET 0 in Apr.(mm)

ET0 in May (mm)

0.5 1

0 20 40 60

Runoff in Apr.(108 m3)

Precipitation in May (mm)

100 150

0 20 40 60

ET 0 in Apr.(mm)

Precipitation in May (mm)

0 50 100

1 2 3 4 5

Precipitation in Jun.(mm) Runoff in Jun.(108 m3)

0.5 1 1.5 2 1

2 3 4 5

Runoff in May (108 m3) Runoff in Jun.(108 m3)

0 50 100

120 140 160 180 200

Precipitation in Jun.(mm)

ET0 in Jun.(mm)

100 120 140 160 180 120

140 160 180 200

ET0 in May (mm)

ET0 in Jun.(mm)

(2)

0.5 1 1.5 2 0

50 100

Runoff in May (108 m3)

Precipitation in Jun.(mm)

100 120 140 160 180 0

50 100

ET 0 in May (mm)

Precipitation in Jun.(mm)

0 50 100

2 4 6 8 10 12

Precipitation in Jul.(mm) Runoff in Jul.(108 m3)

2 4

2 4 6 8 10 12

Runoff in Jun.(108 m3) Runoff in Jul.(108 m3)

0 50 100

120 140 160 180

Precipitation in Jul.(mm)

ET0 in Jul.(mm)

150 200

120 140 160 180

ET0 in Jun.(mm)

ET0 in Jul.(mm)

2 4

0 50 100

Runoff in Jun.(108 m3)

Precipitation in Jul.(mm)

150 200

0 50 100

ET 0 in Jun.(mm)

Precipitation in Jul.(mm)

0 20 40 60 80 2

4 6 8 10 12

Precipitat ion in Aug.(mm) Runoff in Aug.(108 m3)

2 4 6 8 10 12 2

4 6 8 10 12

Runoff in Jul.(108 m3) Runoff in Aug.(108 m3)

0 20 40 60 80 120

140 160

Precipitation in Aug.(mm)

ET0 in Aug.(mm)

120 140 160 180 120

140 160

ET 0 in Jul.(mm)

ET0 in Aug.(mm)

2 4 6 8 10 12 0

20 40 60 80

Runoff in Jul.(108 m3)

Precipitation in Aug.(mm)

120 140 160 180 0

20 40 60 80

ET 0 in Jul.(mm)

Precipitation in Aug.(mm)

0 50 100

2 4 6

Precipitation in Sep.(mm) Runoff in Sep.(108 m3)

2 4 6 8 10 12 2

4 6

Runoff in Aug.(108 m3) Runoff in Sep.(108 m3)

0 50 100

80 100 120 140 160

Precipitation in Sep.(mm)

ET0 in Sep.(mm)

120 140 160 80

100 120 140 160

ET0 in Aug.(mm)

ET0 in Sep.(mm)

(3)

2 4 6 8 10 12 0

50 100

Runoff in Aug.(108 m3)

Precipitation in Sep.(mm)

120 140 160 0

50 100

ET 0 in Aug.(mm)

Precipitation in Sep.(mm)

Note: For runoff, simulated sampling is blue and the observed is red; For ET

0

, simulated sampling is black and the observed is red.

Table S1. The crop coefficients

Crops April May June July October September

Field maize 0.20 0.44 0.53 1.46 1.14 1.22

Seed maize 0.22 0.50 1.16 1.20 1.20 0.60

Wheat 0.30 1.15 1.15 0.93 - -

Table S2. Crop-related parameters

Crops Water production function Cost Benefit per unit water of vegetables (Yuan m

-3

)

Planting area

a b  (Yuan kg

-1

) (ha)

Field

maize -1.22 199.83 3281.67 0.45 - 3906.384

Seed maize -1.23 179.58 3604.24 0.5 - 6403.248

Wheat -1.44 167.67 2328.55 0.45 - 1033.648

Vegetables - - - - 4.16 2080.72

Note: the water production function: Y aW

2

bW , Y is crop yield (kg/ha); W is irrigation water (cm); a , b and  denote coefficients of quadratic term, first order term and constant term of crop water production function, respectively.

Table S3. Infiltration-related coefficients

Parameters values

Utilization coefficient of canal water 0.677

Utilization coefficient of field water 0.8

Coefficient of canal system leakage loss 0.323

Coefficient of field water infiltration 0.284

Coefficient of rainfall infiltration replenishment 0.15

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Equations based on statistical data relating Mach number, relative thickness, sweep and lift coefficient of the wing have to be investigated, checked and improved for their

The data obtained from these 12 equations was checked against the given average relative thickness of 29 carefully selected aircraft, spanning a space of the parameters Mach number,

(Color online) Normal restitution coefficient e n and rebound velocity v rebound as a function of impact velocity v impact for the impacts of particles with various diameters D

Given this purpose, our study required a sample of ASD patients con- taining a wide distribution of sagittal alignments in order to test the correlation of alignment with

Figure 12: Comparison between the drag coefficient evaluated from experiments (exp), final orientation model (f.o.), maximum (max) and minimum (min) eigenvalues projected area

Film thickness and contact length are basic parameters of rivulet flow, while volume flux density, mobile water content and velocities of drainage and wetting fronts (Eqs..

Efficient singlet-singlet energy transfer from 5-acetyl- 5 H-benzo[b] carbazole (donor) to 5 H-benzo[b] carbazole (acceptor) takes place in methylcyclohexane/isopentane as an

However, an analysis of the industry's energy consumption is made difficult by the fact that it is also a producer of energy, and that it has great opportunities of