• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Quantum Information Theory Problem Set 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Quantum Information Theory Problem Set 3"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Quantum Information Theory Problem Set 3

Spring 2008 Prof. R. Renner

Problem 3.1 Quantum-Telepathy Game

Consider the game of ncollaborating players P1, P2, . . . , Pn presented in the lecture. After the players had time to decide on a strategy, two players — let us denote them byP1 andP2 — are randomly chosen without knowing of each other and sent into separate rooms. The remaining n−2 players know who is missing and are allowed to communicate. They broadcast one bit of information (in the form of two coins that are either both heads or both tails) to the chosen players. The two players must then each decide whether to flip their respective coin and the game is won if the two coins end up in different positions.

Classically, this game is won with a probability of at most 75% for largen. Can we use quantum mechanics to improve this result?

The optimal quantum strategy can be sketched as follows: The players decide to prepare a state inH1⊗ H2⊗ · · · ⊗ Hnand distribute it, leaving playeriin control ofHi. When the two players are chosen, the remaining players measure their qubit in some basis and count the number of results of some kind. This number mod 2 is then sent to the chosen players. From this bit, they can deduce the basis in which they have to measure in, such that their results are guaranteed to be different.

a) Let { |0i, |1i } denote the computational basis of the two-dimensional Hilbert space Hi. To warm up, show that

{ |+i:= 1/√

2 (|0i+|1i) , |−i:= 1/√

2 (|0i − |1i)} and { | i:= 1/

2 (|0i+i|1i) , |i:= 1/

2 (|0i −i|1i)} (1)

are alternative bases of Hi.

b) We introduce two quantum operators On± : S Nn i=1Hi

→ S Nn−1 i=1 Hi

, which first measure a|+i or|−irespectively on then-th (last) qubit and then use a partial trace to get rid of then-th subsystem. Give an expression forO±n assuming that both measurement outcomes have equal probability.

c) Let us introduce two entangled states

n±i:= 1

2 |0i⊗n± |1i⊗n

(2) with density operatorsρn±=|Ψn±ihΨn±|. Show that

On+n+) =ρn−1+ , O+nn) =ρn−1 , Onn+) =ρn−1 , and Onn) =ρn−1+ . (3) d) Show that for n= 2, the states can be written as

2+i= 1

√2(| i+| i) and |Ψ2i= 1

√2(|+−i+| −+i). (4)

e) Given above results, work out a detailed quantum strategy that always wins this game.

Problem 3.2 Partial Trace

Given a density matrixρABon the bipartite Hilbert spaceHA⊗ HB andρA = trBρAB, show that ρA is a valid density operator by proving the following properties:

a) Hermiticity — ρAA.

(2)

b) Positivity — ρA≥0.

c) Normalization — trρA= 1.

d) Calculate the reduced density matrix of systemA of the Bell state

|Ψi= 1

2(|00i+|11i), where |abi=|aiA⊗ |biB. (5) What can you say about this reduced state?

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Quantum Information Theory Problem Set 4. Spring

Quantum Information Theory Problem Set 5. Spring

Quantum Information Theory Problem Set 6. Spring

Tsirelson’s inequality (cf. Nielsen/Chuang, Problem 2.3) gives an upper bound on the possible violation of Bell’s inequality in Quantum

Let us consider the following thought experiment: Alice and Bob share a system that is comple- tely described by a random variable Z (the hidden variable). A Bell experiment is

We will now derive some properties of the von Neumann entropy that will be useful in

Furthermore, classical communication between A and B is insecure in that everything broadca- sted over the channel will be heard by E. Prove the

We wish to show that entanglement does not increase under local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Classical communi- cation consists of a measurement on Alice’s