• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

(c) Use second order degenerate perturbation theory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "(c) Use second order degenerate perturbation theory"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Advanced Quantum Theory WS 2015/16

Problem Set 8 Due: 10/11 December 2015

Problem 24 Perturbation Theory (Oral) Consider a two dimensional harmonic oscillator

H = 1

2(p2x+p2y) +1

2(x2+y2) (1)

The Hamiltonian is given in units of ~=m==ω = 1

(a) What are the wave functions and energies of the 3 lowest states?

(b) Next consider a perturbation to the Hamiltonian V = 1

2xy(x2+y2), (1) (2)

Compute to first order in perturbation theory the effect of V on the energies of the states calculated in part (a).

Hint: The wave function and the energy of 2D H.O are

ψn1,n2 =Nn1,n2e−(x2+y2)/2Hn1(x)Hn2(y), (3) En1,n2 =n1+n2+ 1 (4) Where Hi are Hermite polynomials.

Problem 25 3-Level System (Oral)

A system that has three unperturbed states can be represented by the perturbed Hamiltonian matrix

Hˆ =

E1 0 a 0 E1 b a b E2

, (5)

where E2 > E1. The quantities a and b are to be regarded as perturbations that are of the same order and small compared toE2−E1.

(a) Use second order non-degenerate perturbation theory to calculate the perturbed eigenvalues.

Is this procedure correct?

(b) Diagonalize the matrix to find the exact eigenvalues.

(c) Use second order degenerate perturbation theory. Compare the results obtained.

1

(2)

Problem 26 Interacting spins (Written)

A system of 3 (non identicle) spin one half particles, whose spin operators are S~1, S~2, and S~3, is governed by the Hamiltonian

H=AS~1. ~S2

~2 +B(S~1+S~2). ~S3

~2 (6)

Find the energy levels and their degeneracies.

Problem 27 spin 1/2 particle in magnetic field (Oral)

The Hamiltonian for a spin 1/2 particle with charge +ein an external magnetic field is, H =− ge

2mc

S. ~~ B (7)

Calculate the operator d~dts ifB~ =By. What isˆ Sz(t) in matrix form?

2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In what follows we consider three cases: time independent non-degenerate perturbation theory, time independent degenerate perturbation theory and time dependent perturbation theory.

(3.8) Any approximate solution of the electronic Schr¨ odinger equation at some initial dis- tance d i enables us to estimate the binding energy of any other d using the

共48兲, can thus be calculated in the same way as K 共4兲 , with only the following modifications of the diagram rules: 共 i 兲 diagrams can be irreducible and reducible between

When try- ing to connect the nonlinear response with equilibrium correlation functions, however, a fundamental difference compared to the FDT appears: While the evaluation of

Application of Gauss’s theorem (38) immediately yields the well known Hadamard form of the first shape derivative.. Recall the definition of the curvature vector κ in (29) and the

In Chapter 5, we use basin stability in complex networks of second-order Kuramoto models to demonstrate a novel phenomenon where two first-order transitions occur successively: an

Initially (at time zero) the system be in the ground state of the unperturbed harmonic

We take these issues – macroeconomic and macro financial variables that design economic state and evolution, agent’s economic and financial variables that