• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Regional Cooperation on Flood Management in the Sava River Basin

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Regional Cooperation on Flood Management in the Sava River Basin"

Copied!
15
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Regional Cooperation on Flood Management in the Sava River Basin

Dr Dejan Komatina,

Berlin, 26 March 2015

„Water management in South East Europe“

SEE Forum in the frame of the WATER BERLIN INTERNATIONAL

(2)

Sava river basin

(3)

Legal framework

Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin – FASRB

(the first development-oriented multilateral agreement in the region)

Key objective:

Transboundary water cooperation for sustainable development of the region

All aspects of water resources management integrated

(protection + development)

• Implementation coordinated by the ISRBC

(4 member countries + Montenegro)

(4)

Scope of cooperation

Management plans

(river basin, sediment, flood risk, climate change adaptation)

Integrated systems

(information, forecasting, warning)

Economic activities

(navigation, river tourism)

• Harmonization of regulation

(national → EU)

Protocols to the FASRB

(e.g. flood protection)

(5)

Projects

Agreed by all countries

Direct benefits

Preparation and/or

implementation of projects – Raising funds from external

sources (~ 90%)

Indirect benefits

Facilitation of fund-raising for the countries

Lower costs for the countries in case of joint ventures

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Share (%)

Year

Share of the externally funded projects

1 2

1 – Share in terms of the projects’ number 2 – Share in terms of the projects’ budget

(6)

Mechanism

Stakeholders

Wide range horizontally

(ministries, water agencies, NHMSs, etc.)

All sectors of society – Levels of participation

• Provision of information

• Consultation

• Active involvement

Int’l community

– UNECE and EU regulation – ICPDR and DC (MoUs)

(7)

Flood management

Main objective:

Prevent or limit floods,

and reduce and eliminate adverse consequences

(8)

Protocol on Flood Protection (2010)

Flood Risk Management Plan

(EU Flood Directive)

Flood forecasting and warning system

(FFWS)

Exchange of information

Flood defence emergency situations

(incl. mutual assistance)

Ratified by 3 countries

Entry into force:

mid-2015

(expected)

(9)

Flood Risk Management Plan

Initial steps

Draft Program

– Initial flood vulnerab. assesment – Joint PFRA Report (incl. May ‘14 flood)

Preparation of the Plan, incl.

Summary of Measures

(2015-2017)

Zagreb

(Bosanski) Brod Slavonski Brod

Sremska Mitrovica

(10)

Flood forecasting and warning

Simulation models

(hydrologic, hydraulic)

Upgrade of models

(2015)

• Implementation of FFWS – Phase 1

(2015-2017)

Hydrologic model

Hydraulic model

Consequence assessment

(11)

Data and information exchange

Platform for exchange

– HM Data Exchange Policy (principles, minimum)

– Hydrological Yearbook and Data Portal

– Hydrological Information System (2015-2016)

(12)

Other relevant activities

Sava River Basin Management Plan

Sava GIS – Phase 1

(2015)

Water and Climate Adaptation Plan

– Guidance Notes

– Measures, recommendations

(13)

Commitment of the Parties

Belgrade, June 16, 2014 Zagreb, Dec. 2, 2014

• Sessions of the ISRBC

• Meetings of the Parties

• Other high-level meetings

(14)

Key messages

Sound legal framework

– FASRB

– Protocol on Flood Protection

Solid institutional framework

– Regional network of institutions /

people (political and expert levels)

– Achievements / ongoing activities – Mechanism for preparation and

implementation of regional projects

Make the best use of it!

(15)

Contact information

International Sava River Basin Commission

Kneza Branimira 29 10000 Zagreb

Croatia

www.savacommission.org

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

This chapter has presented and discussed the research approach, the research methods, the sampling methods, the data-collection techniques, the research instruments and

– Coverage of additional services by almost all parties, including new coverage of telecommunications services by eight parties;. – Some improvements in the coverage

Knowing that the river capacity is around 650 m 3 /s in Fribourg, the preventive operations enable to avoid an overflow. Moreover, it is interesting to know that the discharge

It is estimated that in Hungary irrevocable water losses in 1980 may be more than the amount of water which is generated in the entire Hungarian portion of the Tisza River basin

With extreme water discharge values of over 7,000 cubic metres per second above the confluence with the Rhine, the peak discharges of the Aare simulated as part of the EXAR

(1) The major problem of the Nitra River basin is the extremely poor water quality (Class 1V- V according to the existing classification system) prohibiting most of the

A s for Lake Cabora Bassa, the upstream catchment area of the Luangwe River is already characterized by the local occurrence of high erosion hazards in scenario

Establishing this cooperation, especially on improving the water quality of the Danube, will be complicated by the power asymmetry between the upstream and