• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Universality behaviour for polarity formation in channel-type inclusion compounds

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Universality behaviour for polarity formation in channel-type inclusion compounds"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

J Math Chem (2009) 45:882–883 DOI 10.1007/s10910-008-9469-1

E R R AT U M

Universality behaviour for polarity formation in channel-type inclusion compounds

Athanasios Batagiannis · Thomas Wüst · Jürg Hulliger

Published online: 25 September 2008

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Erratum to: J Math Chem

DOI 10.1007/s10910-008-9433-0

Table 1 in the original article is missing some text and characters. The table should read as follows:

Table 1 Guest–guest and

host–guest interaction energies Eij Range (kJ mol−1)

EAD −25.0 to 0.01

EAA 0.01 to 10.0

EDD −5.0 to 5.0

ECj −5.0 to 5.0

In Eq. 6, a subscript character is missing; the equation should appear as follows:

P

i j

= X e

−β(Ei j+EC j)

Z

i

(6) Figures 3 and 8 appear in color in the online version of the article. Where dashes appear in the captions of the original, there should be written out the corresponding color terminology.

Therefore the caption to Fig. 3 should read:

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s10910-008-9433-0.

A. Batagiannis·T. Wüst·J. Hulliger (

B

)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Berne, Freiestrasse 3, 3012 Berne, Switzerland

e-mail: publication.hulliger@iac.unibe.ch

123

(2)

J Math Chem (2009) 45:882–883 883

Fig. 3 Net polarity Xnet, as a function of XN, the fraction of non-polar guests included in the crystal. Xnet is plotted for various values of Xg(dark blue line: Xg =0.05, light blue line: Xg =0.25, purple line:

Xg=0.5, yellow line: Xg=0.75, green line: Xg=0.95). Interactions energies were randomly chosen within the energy range given in Appendix 1. Dashed curves were obtained from calculations using an extended hypothetical energy range (−100<Ei j <100 kJ mol1). The solid black lines show the upper limits of Xnetas a function of XN

Fig. 8 The effect of temperature on polarity for various concentrations Xg(black line: Xg=0, light blue line: Xg = 0.00001, red line: Xg =0.0001, purple line: Xg = 0.0003, green line: Xg = 0.001, dark blue line: Xg =0.01). The interaction energies used for the calculations were EAD = −25 kJ mol−1, EAA=5 kJ mol1and EDD= −5 kJ mol1. Surprisingly, a very small amount of neutral D–π–D mole- cules in the gas phase can have a strong effect on polarity as temperature is varied

and the caption to Fig. 8 should read:

In Appendix 1, “Substituting Eqs. 3 and 3” should read “Substituting Eqs. 3 and 4”, and “Substituting Eq. 3 for the probabilities” should read “Substituting Eq. 6 for the probabilities”.

123

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The Tip60 chromatin remodeling complex is required for maintenance and polarity of Drosophila neural stem

As shown before [9–11], macroscopic polarity in channel-type hosts filled with a single type of dipolar guests arises as a result of orientational selectivity driven by the

For reasonable interaction energies attributed to increasing order, the main extra contribution to polarity formation results from interactions up to next nearest neighbours..

In the context of the above challenges this thesis project aims to explore the utilisation of a numerical software model to study the effects of borehole ballooning that occurs while

One may then argue that elements which are not perceived as NPIs in the modern language (not/nicht, nobody/niemand, nowhere/nirgends, never/niemals etc.) had essentially the same

13 Plutarch, Lives: Pericles and Fabius Maximus, Translated by Bernadotte Perrin, Loeb Classical Library Edition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1919), 9.2-3.. 14

The scalar licensing analysis maintains that polarity sensitivity rests on two independent pragmatic ingredients, namely evoking alternatives (ALT) and emphatic scalar

According to Zeijlstra, n-words are semantically non-negative elements carrying an uninterpretable negative feature [uNEG] that has to be checked by an interpretable negative