• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Critical Tests of Theory of the

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Critical Tests of Theory of the "

Copied!
77
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Eiichiro Komatsu (MPA)

Münchner Physik Kolloquium, July 15, 2013

1

WMAP

Critical Tests of Theory of the

Early Universe using the CMB

(2)

Congratulations, Prof. Mukhanov!

July 11, 2013

Today’s talk is about how we have come to find that Prof. Mukhanov’s

prediction back in 1981 is correct!

2

(3)

Prediction

The origin of structures in the universe (galaxies, stars, ourselves) was provided by quantum fluctuations in the very early universe; and

The amplitude of fluctuations was slightly larger on large scales and smaller on smaller scales.

Mukhanov & Chibisov (1981)

3

(4)

This is (ahem) crazy.

Galaxies are gigantic objects on macroscopic scales!

How can they arise from quantum fluctuations?

This is a remarkable, bold, and highly non-trivial statement one can make.

And it turns out to be true!

4

(5)

The Breakthrough

Now we can observe the physical condition of the Universe when it was very young.

5

(6)

Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)

Fossil light of the Big Bang!

6

(7)

From “Cosmic Voyage”

(8)

How was CMB created?

When the Universe was hot, it was a hot soup made of:

Protons, electrons, and helium nuclei

Photons and neutrinos

Dark matter (DM)

DM does not do much, except for providing a a gravitational potential because ρDMH,He~5

8

(9)

Universe as a hot soup

Free electrons can scatter photons

efficiently.

Photons cannot go very far.

proton helium

electron

photon

9

(10)

Recombination and Decoupling

[recombination]

When the temperature falls below 3000 K,

almost all electrons are captured by protons

and helium nuclei.

[decoupling] Photons are no longer

scattered. I.e., photons and electrons are no

longer coupled.

Time

1500K

6000K

3000K

proton helium electron photon 10

(11)

CMB: The Farthest and Oldest Light That We Can Ever Hope To Observe Directly

When the Universe was 3000K (~380,000 years after the Big Bang), electrons and protons were combined to form neutral hydrogen. 11

(12)
(13)

COBE/DMR, 1992

•Isotropic?

•CMB is anisotropic! (10–5 level)

13

Smoot et al. (1992)

1cm

6mm

3mm

A copy of one of the

detectors is located in the exhibition of

“Excellence Cluster Universe” in

Deutsches Museum

(14)

COBE to WMAP (x35 better resolution)

COBE

WMAP

COBE 1989

WMAP

2001 14

(15)

WMAP WMAP Spacecraft Spacecraft

MAP990422

thermally isolated instrument cylinder

secondary reflectors

focal plane assembly feed horns

back to back Gregorian optics, 1.4 x 1.6 m primaries

upper omni antenna line of sight

deployed solar array w/ web shielding medium gain antennae

passive thermal radiator

warm spacecraft with:

- instrument electronics

- attitude control/propulsion - command/data handling - battery and power control

60K

90K

300K

Radiative Cooling: No Cryogenic System

15

(16)

WMAP at Lagrange 2 (L2) Point

June 2001:

WMAP launched!

February 2003:

The first-year data release March 2006:

The three-year data release March 2008:

The five-year data release January 2010:

The seven-year data release

16

used to be

September 8, 2010:

WMAP left L2

December 21, 2012:

The final, nine-year data release

(17)

WMAP Science Team

C.L. Bennett

G. Hinshaw

N. Jarosik

S.S. Meyer

L. Page

D.N. Spergel

E.L. Wright

M.R. Greason

M. Halpern

R.S. Hill

A. Kogut

M. Limon

N. Odegard

G.S. Tucker

J. L.Weiland

E.Wollack

J. Dunkley

B. Gold

E. Komatsu

D. Larson

M.R. Nolta

K.M. Smith

C. Barnes

R. Bean

O. Dore

H.V. Peiris

L. Verde

17

(18)

WMAP 9-Year Papers

Bennett et al., “Final Maps and Results,” accepted for publication in Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, arXiv:1212.5225

Hinshaw et al., “Cosmological Parameter Results,” accepted for publication in Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,

arXiv:1212.5226

18

(19)

23 GHz [unpolarized]

19

(20)

33 GHz [unpolarized]

20

(21)

41 GHz [unpolarized]

21

(22)

61 GHz [unpolarized]

22

(23)

94 GHz [unpolarized]

23

(24)

How many components?

1. CMB: Tν

~ ν

0

2. Synchrotron (electrons going around magnetic fields): Tν

~ ν

–3

3. Free-free (electrons colliding with protons): Tν

~ ν

–2

4. Dust (heated dust emitting thermal emission): Tν2 5. Spinning dust (rapidly rotating tiny dust grains):

Tν~complicated

You need at least five frequencies to separate them! 24

(25)

Galaxy-cleaned Map

25

(26)

Analysis:

2-point Correlation

• C(θ)=(1/4π)∑(2l+1)ClPl(cosθ)

• How are temperatures on two

points on the sky, separated by θ, are correlated?

• “Power Spectrum,” Cl

– How much fluctuation power do

we have at a given angular scale?

– l~180 degrees / θ

26

θ

COBE

WMAP

(27)

COBE/DMR Power Spectrum Angle ~ 180 deg / l

Angular Wavenumber, l 27

~9 deg

~90 deg

(quadrupole)

(28)

COBE To WMAP

• COBE is unable to resolve the structures below ~7 degrees

• WMAP’s resolving power is 35 times better than COBE.

• What did WMAP see?

28

θ

COBE

WMAP

θ

(29)

WMAP 9-year Power Spectrum

Angular Power Spectrum

Large Scale Small Scale

about

1 degree on the sky COBE

29

(30)

The Cosmic Sound Wave

“The Universe as a Miso soup”

Main Ingredients: protons, helium nuclei, electrons, photons

We measure the composition of the Universe by

analyzing the wave form of the cosmic sound waves. 30

(31)

With CMB, we can measure:

Amount of protons and helium nuclei; or anything that can interact with photons

Amount of dark matter; or anything that can contribute to gravitational potential

...at the time when the universe was at 3000 K.

No matter is left behind! 31

(32)

CMB to Baryon & Dark Matter

1-to-2: baryon-to-photon ratio

1-to-3: matter-to-radiation ratio Baryon Density (Ωb)

Total Matter Density (Ωm)

=Baryon+Dark Matter

32

(33)

Total Matter Density from z=1090

Total Energy Density from the Distance to z=1090

• Angular Diameter Distance to z=1090

=H

0–1

∫ dz / [Ω

m

(1+z)

3

+ Ω

Λ

]

1/2 33

Ωm

dark energy

(34)

34

Dark Energy: 72.1%

Dark Matter: 23.3%

H&He: 4.6%

Age: 13.7 billion years H0: 70 km/s/Mpc

(35)

Composition of the Univ.

28%

72% Matter

Dark Energy

72% of the present-day energy density in our

Universe is NOT EVEN MATTER!

35

(36)
(37)
(38)

Origin of Fluctuations

OK, back to the cosmic hot soup.

The sound waves were created when we perturbed it.

“We”? Who?

Who actually perturbed the cosmic soup?

Who generated the original (seed) ripples?

38

(39)

Theory of the Very Early Universe

The leading theoretical idea about the primordial Universe, called “Cosmic Inflation,” predicts:

The expansion of our Universe accelerated in a tiny fraction of a second after its birth.

Just like Dark Energy accelerating today’s expansion: the acceleration also happened at very, very early times!

Inflation stretches “micro to macro”

In a tiny fraction of a second, the size of an atomic nucleus (~10-15m) would be stretched to 1 A.U. (~1011m), at least.

39

(Starobinsky 1980; Sato 1981; Guth 1981;

Linde 1982; Albrecht & Steinhardt 1982; Starobinsky 1980)

(40)

Cosmic Inflation = Very Early Dark Energy

40

(41)

WMAP 9-year Power Spectrum

Angular Power Spectrum

Large Scale Small Scale

about

1 degree on the sky COBE

41

(42)

Getting rid of the Sound Waves

Angular Power Spectrum

42

Primordial Ripples

Large Scale Small Scale

(43)

The Early Universe Could Have Done This Instead

Angular Power Spectrum

43

More Power on Small Scales

Small Scale Large Scale

(44)

...or, This.

Angular Power Spectrum

44

More Power on Large Scales

Small Scale Large Scale

(45)

...or, This.

Angular Power Spectrum

45

Small Scale Large Scale

Parametrization:

l(l+1)C l ~ l ns–1

And, Slava predicted

n s ~0.96 in 1981

(46)

Theory Says...

The leading theoretical idea about the primordial Universe, called “Cosmic Inflation,” predicts:

The expansion of our Universe accelerated in a tiny fraction of a second after its birth.

the primordial ripples were created by quantum fluctuations during inflation, and

how the power is distributed over the scales is

determined by the expansion history during cosmic inflation.

Measurement of ns gives us this remarkable information!

46

(47)

Stretching Micro to Macro

Macroscopic size at which gravity becomes important

Quantum fluctuations on microscopic scalesδφ INFLATION!

Quantum fluctuations cease to be quantum, and become observable!δφ 47

(48)

Quantum Fluctuations

You may borrow a lot of energy from vacuum if you promise to return it to the vacuum immediately.

The amount of energy you can borrow is inversely proportional to the time for which you borrow the energy from the vacuum.

48

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle

(49)

(Scalar) Quantum Fluctuations

Why is this relevant?

The cosmic inflation (probably) happened when the Universe was a tiny fraction of second old.

Something like 10-36 second old

(Expansion Rate) ~ 1/(Time)

which is a big number! (~1012GeV)

Quantum fluctuations were important during inflation!

δφ = (Expansion Rate)/(2π) [in natural units]

49

Mukhanov & Chibisov (1981) Guth & Pi (1982); Starobinsky (1982); Hawking (1982) Bardeen, Turner & Steinhardt (1983)

(50)

Inflation Offers a Magnifier for Microscopic World

Using the power spectrum of primordial fluctuations imprinted in CMB, we can observe the quantum phenomena at the

ultra high-energy scales that would never be reached by the particle accelerator.

• Measured value (WMAP 9-year data only):

n

s

= 0.972 ± 0.013 (68%CL)

50

(51)

51

1000

100

South Pole Telescope [10-m in South Pole]

Atacama Cosmology Telescope [6-m in Chile]

(52)

52

1000

100

South Pole Telescope [10-m in South Pole]

Atacama Cosmology Telescope [6-m in Chile]

n

s

= 0.965 ± 0.010 (68%CL)

(53)

Planck Result!

Residual

Planck (2013)

(54)

Planck Result!

Residual

Planck (2013)

n

s

= 0.960 ± 0.007 (68%CL)

First >5σ discovery of ns<1 from the CMB alone

(55)

Quantum fluctuations also generate ripples in space- time, i.e., gravitational waves, by the same mechanism.

h = (Expansion Rate)/(21/2πMplanck) [in natural units]

[h = “strain”]

55

(Tensor) Quantum Fluctuations, a.k.a. Gravitational Waves

Starobinsky (1979)

(56)

The Key Predictions of Inflation

Fluctuations we observe today originated from quantum fluctuations generated during inflation

There should also be ultra-long-wavelength gravitational waves originated from quantum (or classical)

fluctuations generated during inflation

ζ h ij

56

scalar mode

tensor mode

(57)

We are measuring distortions in space

A distance between two points in space

dl2 = a2(t)e2ζ(x,t)[eh]ijdxidxj

= a2(t)[1+2ζ(x,t)+...][δij+hij(x,t)+...]dxidxj

ζ(x,t): “curvature perturbation” (scalar mode)

hij(x,t): “gravitational waves” (tensor mode)

Area-conserving anisotropic stretching of space: det[eh]=1

57

(58)

We are measuring distortions in space

A distance between two points in space

dl2 = a2(t)e2ζ(x,t)[eh]ijdxidxj

= a2(t)[1+2ζ(x,t)+...][δij+hij(x,t)+...]dxidxj

58

ζ(x,t)>0: more (isotropic) stretching of space

More redshift -> colder photons

The Sachs-Wolfe formula gives dT/T = –ζ/5

(59)

We are measuring distortions in space

A distance between two points in space

dl2 = a2(t)e2ζ(x,t)[eh]ijdxidxj

= a2(t)[1+2ζ(x,t)+...][δij+hij(x,t)+...]dxidxj

59

hij(x,t): anisotropic stretching of space

(60)

Energy density spectrum of primordial GW from inflation

Watanabe & Komatsu (2006)

Einflation=1016 GeV CMB scale

60

LISA scale

(61)

Gravitational waves are coming toward you... What do you do?

• Gravitational waves stretch

space, causing particles to move.

61

(62)

Two Polarization States of GW

• This is great - this will automatically

generate quadrupolar anisotropy around electrons!

62

(63)

From GW to

temperature anisotropy

63

Electron

(64)

From GW to

temperature anisotropy

64

Redshift

Redshift

Blueshift Blueshift

Redshift

Redshift

Blues Blues hift

hift

(65)

“Tensor-to-scalar Ratio,” r

r = [Power in Gravitational Waves]

/ [Power in Curvature Perturbation]

= <h ij,k0 h ij,k0* >/<| ζ k0 | 2 > at k

0

=0.002 Mpc

–1

Inflation predicts r <~ 1

65

(66)

WMAP 9-year results

(Hinshaw, Larson, Komatsu, et al. 2012) r<0.12 (95%CL)

66

(67)

WMAP 9-year results

(Hinshaw, Larson, Komatsu, et al. 2012)

Planck confirms our results

67

Planck Collaboration XXII (2013)

r<0.12 (95%CL)

(68)

So, has inflation really happened?

We do not know yet.

The missing piece: primordial gravitational waves from inflation

When the ultra-long-wavelength gravitational waves are found, we can finally declare that inflation really happened!

68

(69)

Physics of CMB Polarization

CMB Polarization is created by a local temperature

quadrupole anisotropy. 69

Wayne Hu

(70)

Two Polarization States of GW

• This is great - this will automatically

generate quadrupolar anisotropy around electrons!

70

(71)

From GW to CMB Polarization

71

Electron

(72)

From GW to CMB Polarization

72

Redshift

Redshift

Blueshift Blueshift

Redshift

Redshift

Blues Blues hift

hift

(73)

From GW to CMB Polarization

73

Gravitational waves can produce CMB polarization

patterns, which are 45 tilted from one another

(74)

E-mode and B-mode

Gravitational potential can generate the E-

mode polarization, but not B-modes.

Gravitational

waves can generate both E- and B-modes!

B mode

E mode

74

(75)

No detection of B-mode polarization yet.

B-mode is the next holy grail!

Po la ri za tio n Po w er Spectrum

75

(76)

LiteBIRD

Next-generation polarization-sensitive microwave experiment. Target launch date: ~2020

Led by Prof. Masashi Hazumi (KEK); a collaboration of ~60 scientists in Japan, USA, Canada, and Germany

We aim at detecting signatures of gravitational waves in the cosmic microwave background, down to r~0.001

76

(77)

Summary

WMAP has completed 9 years of observations

We could determine the age, composition, expansion rate, etc., from CMB

We could even push the boundary farther back in time, probing the origin of fluctuations in the very early

Universe: inflationary epoch at ultra-high energies

ns=0.96 discovered with >5σ

Next Big Thing: Primordial gravitational waves

77

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

• Quantum fluctuations also generate ripples in space- time, i.e., gravitational waves, by the same mechanism. • Primordial gravitational waves

• Exponential expansion (inflation) stretches the wavelength of quantum fluctuations to cosmological scales.. Starobinsky (1980); Sato (1981); Guth (1981); Linde (1982); Albrecht

• Exponential expansion (inflation) stretches the wavelength of quantum fluctuations to cosmological scales.. Starobinsky (1980); Sato (1981); Guth (1981); Linde (1982); Albrecht

• Using the power spectrum of primordial fluctuations imprinted in CMB, we can observe the quantum phenomena at the. ultra high-energy scales that would never be reached by

• The WMAP and Planck’s temperature data provide strong evidence for the quantum origin of. structures in

Space is stretched =&gt; Wavelength of light is also

• Quantum fluctuations also generate ripples in space- time, i.e., gravitational waves, by the same mechanism. h = (Expansion Rate)/(2 1/2 πM planck ) [in

Detect CMB polarisation in multiple frequencies, to make sure that it is from the CMB (i.e., Planck spectrum). Check for scale invariance: Consistent with a scale