• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Frettl¨oh 14.1.2020 Formal Logic — Exercise Sheet 12 Exercise 45: (Relations and directed graphs) Visualise the following relations as directed graphsG= (W, R)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Frettl¨oh 14.1.2020 Formal Logic — Exercise Sheet 12 Exercise 45: (Relations and directed graphs) Visualise the following relations as directed graphsG= (W, R)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Dr. D. Frettl¨oh 14.1.2020

Formal Logic — Exercise Sheet 12

Exercise 45: (Relations and directed graphs)

Visualise the following relations as directed graphsG= (W, R). I.e., the nodes of Gare the elements ofW, the edges ofGare the (ordered!) elements ofR. Visualise also (W, R2) and (W, R3) in each case.

(a)W ={0,1,2,3},R={(n, m)|n, m∈W,|n−m|= 1}

(b)W ={0,1,2,3,4,5},R={(n, m)|n, m∈W, n+m= 0 mod 3}

(c)W ={∅,{1},{2},{3},{1,2},{2,3},{1,3},{1,2,3}},R={(n, m)|n, m∈W, n⊆m}

State for each of the nine relations (W, Ri) (i = 1,2,3) whether they are reflexive, and/or symmetric, and/or transitive.

Exercise 46: (More rules) (a)Prove Rule 5 of Theorem 4.1.

(You may use rules 1,2,6 and 7 in order to transform one of the formulas into the other.) (b)Prove Rule 4 of Theorem 4.1 by showing that(F⇒G)⇒(F⇒ G) is a tautology.

(You may use rules 1,2,6 and 7 in order to tranform this expression into one like F∨ ¬F∨...; this is obviously a tautology.)

(c)Show that the following variant of Rule 6 in Theorem 4.1:

(F∧ G)≡ (F∧G) does not hold; for instance, by providing a counterexample.

Exercise 47: (Tautologies)

Two out of the following four formulas are tautologies. Which one is, which one is not a tautology? For the tautologies: prove that they are tautologies. For the ones that are not tautologies give a structureA= (W, R, α) ands∈W such thatA(Hi, s) = 0.

(a)H1=F⇒ F (b)H2=F ⇒ F (c)H3=F ⇒F (d)H4= F ⇒ F

Hand in your solutions until 20.1.2020 at 11:00 in post box 2183 in V3, or via email to your tutor.

Tutors: Oliver Tautz otautz@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de Wed 8-10 Jonas Kalinski jkalinski@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de Tue 16-18

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Thus, the fragment in Figure 2(b) that has a different edge insertion order is not canonical and can be pruned during the enumeration of the search lattice without any

Instead, we believe that while the structural approach is often the only one available for forecasting at the global scale, the rational-choice framework is

The advantages of the protocol presented here for SDM compared to standard QCM protocol can be summarized as follows: (i) a much broader variety of sequences can be used as

Signed k-dominating function; minimal signed k-dominating func- tion; upper signed k-domination number; directed graph.... The concept of the signed k-dominating function of digraphs

A survey of results on domination in directed graphs by Ghoshal, Lasker and Pillone is found in chapter 15 of Haynes et al., [1], but most of the results in this survey chapter

The minimal number of cops needed to capture the robber in a robber- monotone way in the DAG Game on a directed graph does not change, if the Cop player is permitted to move only

Since these subgames are small objects and it can be checked efficiently whether a player wins every play on a given graph, the winner of a finite parity game can be determined in NP

An arc is called a candidate arc if it leaves the leading vertex and was either removed or ignored, or if it enters the leading vertex and is part of an ( s , t ) -path or left