• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Lebesgue measure isnot G-invariant

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Lebesgue measure isnot G-invariant"

Copied!
17
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

A transformation may have many invariant measures, but some are more improtant than others.

Example 1: To nd the digits in the standardcontinued fraction expansion of a real numberx:

x =a0+ 1 a1+ 1

a2+ 1

a3+ 1

...

= [ao :a1,a2,a3, . . .]

we need theGauÿ map G : [0,1)→(0,1]:

G(x) = 1x − b1xc.

(2)

a0 =bxc x1 =x−a0.

ai =b1/xic xi+1 =G(xi) (stop ifxi+1=0).

For example:

π= [3;7,15,1,292,1,1,1, . . .] and

e = [2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,1,1,10, . . .] Lebesgue measure isnot G-invariant.

(3)

Denition: A measure µis called absolutely continuousw.r.t. the measureν (notation: µν) if ν(A) =0 impliesµ(A) =0. If both µν andν µ, thenµandν are calledequivalent.

Theorem of Radon-Nikodym: If µis a probability measure and µν then there is a functionh ∈L1(ν)(calledRadon-Nikodym derivativeordensity) such that µ(A) =R

Ah(x) dν(x) for every measurable setA.

Notation: h(x) = dµ(x)dν(x).

Example 1: Lebesgue measure is notG-invariant, but there is a probability measureµG that is absolutely continuous w.r.t.

Lebesgue.

µG(A) = Z

A

h(x)dx for h(x) = 1 log2

1 1+x.

(4)

Proposition 1. Suppose that µν are bothT-invariant

probability measures, with a commonσ-algebraBof measurable sets. If ν is ergodic, then µ=ν.

Proof: First we show thatµis ergodic. Indeed, otherwise there is a T-invariant setAsuch that µ(A)>0 and µ(Ac)>0. By

ergodicity ofν at least one ofAor Ac must haveν-measure 0, but this would contradict thatµν.

Now letA∈ B and letY ⊂X be the set of ν-typical points. Then ν(Yc) =0 and hence µ(Yc) =0. Applying Birkho's Ergodic Theorem toµ andν separately for ψ=1A and some µ-typical y∈Y, we get

µ(A) = lim

n

1 n

n−1

X

i=0

ψ◦T(y) =ν(A).

ButA∈ B was arbitrary, soµ=ν.

(5)

Exercise 4.1: Show that the condition of ergodicity is essential for Proposition 1?

Ifµν andµis ergodic. Does it follow that µ=ν?

Proposition 2: LetT :U ⊂Rn→U be (piecewise) dierentiable, andµ is absolutely continuous w.r.t. Lebesgue. Thenµis

T-invariant if and only if its densityh = dx satises h(x) = X

T(y)=x

h(y)

|detDT(y)| (1) for everyx.

(6)

Proof of Proposition 2: TheT-invariance means that dµ(x) =dµ(T1(x)), but we need to be aware thatT1 is multivalued. So it is more careful to split the spaceU into pieces Un such that the restrictionsTn:=T|Un are dieomorphic (onto their images) and writeyn=Tn1(x) =T1(x)∩Un. Then we obtain (using the change of coordinates)

h(x) dx = dµ(x) =dµ(T1(x)) =X

n

dµ◦Tn1(x)

= X

n

h(yn)|det(DTn1)(x)|dyn=X

n

h(yn)

det|DT(yn)|dyn. Conversely, if (1) holds, then the above computation gives

dµ(x) =dµ◦T1(x).

(7)

Example 1 continued: TheGauÿ map has invariant density h(x) = log121+x1 . Here log12 is just the normalising factor (so that R1

0 h(x)dx =1).

LetIn= (n+11,1n]for n=1,2,3, . . . be the domains of the branches ofG, and forx ∈(0,1), and yn:=G1(x)∩In= x+n1 . AlsoG0(yn) =−y12

n. Therefore X

n≥1

h(yn)

|G0(yn)| = 1 log2

X

n≥1

yn2 1+yn

= 1 log2

X

n≥1

(x+n)1 2

1+x+n1

= 1

log2 X

n≥1

1

x+n · 1 x+n+1

= 1

log2 X

n≥1

1

x+n − 1

x+n+1 telescoping series

= 1

log2 1

x+1 =h(x).

(8)

Exercise 4.2: Compute the average frequency of the digit 1 for points that are normal w.r.t. the standard continued fraction.

Exercise 4.3: Show that for each integern≥2, the interval map given by

Tn(x) =

(nx if 0≤x ≤ 1n,

x1 − bx1c if 1n <x ≤1, has invariant densityh(x) = log121+x1 .

(9)

Example 2: The mapT :R\ {0} →R, T(x) =x−1x is called the Boole transformation. It is 2-to-1; the two preimages of x∈Rare y±= 12(x±√

x2+4). Clearly T0(x) =1+x12. It can be shown

that 1

|T0(y)|+ 1

|T0(y+)| =1. Indeed,

|T0(y±)|=1+ 2 x2+2±x√

x2+4

and 1

|T0(y±)| = x2+2±x√ x2+4 x2+4±x√

x2+4, and

(10)

1

|T0(y)|+ 1

|T0(y+)|

= x2+2−x√ x2+4 x2+4−x√

x2+4+x2+2+x√ x2+4 x2+4+x√

x2+4

= (x2+2−x√

x2+4)(x2+4+x√ x2+4) (x2+4)2−x2(x2+4)

+ (x2+2+x√

x2+4)(x2+4−x√ x2+4) (x2+4)2−x2(x2+4)

= (x2+2)2−x2(x2+4) +2(x2+2)−2x√ x2+4

4(x2+4) +

(x2+2)2−x2(x2+4) +2(x2+2) +2x√ x2+4 4(x2+4)

= 4(x2+2) +8 4(x2+4) =1.

Thereforeh(x)≡1 is an invariant density, so Lebesgue measure is preserved.

(11)

Example 3: If T : [0,1]→[0,1]is (countably) piecewise linear, and each branchT :In→[0,1](on whichT is ane) is onto, thenT preserves Lebesgue measure. Indeed, the intervalsIn have pairwise disjoint interiors, and their lengths add up to 1. Ifsn is the slope of T :In→[0,1], thensn=1/|In|. Therefore

X

n

1

DT(yn) =X

n

1 sn =X

n

|In|=1.

Folklore TheoremIfT :S1 →S1 is aC2 expanding circle map, then it preserves a measureµequivalent to Lebesgue, andµis ergodic.

Expandingmeans that there is λ >1 such that|T0(x)| ≥λfor all x∈S1. The above theorem can be proved in more generality, but in the stated version it conveys the ideas more clearly.

(12)

Proof: Using the Mean Value Theorem twice, we obtain log|T0(x)|

|T0(y)| = log(1+|T0(x)| − |T0(y)|

|T0(y)| )≤ |T0(x)| − |T0(y)|

|T0(y)|

= |T00(ξ)| · |x−y|

|T0(y)| = |T00(ξ)|

|T0(y)|

|Tx−Ty| T0(ζ) .

SinceT is expanding, the denominators are ≥λand sinceT isC2 on a compact space, also|T00(ξ)|is bounded. Therefore there is someK ≤sup|T00(ξ)|/λ2 such that

log|T0(x)|

|T0(y)| ≤K|T(x)−T(y)|.

The chain rule then gives:

log|DTn(x)|

|DTn(y)| =

n−1

X

i=0

log|T0(Tix)|

|T0(Tiy)| ≤K

n

X

i=1

|Ti(x)−Ti(y)|.

(13)

SinceT is a continuous expanding map of the circle, it wraps the circled times around itself, and for each n, there aredn pairwise disjoint intervalsZn such that Tn:Zn→S1 is onto, with slope at leastλn. If we take x,y above in one suchZn, then

|x−y| ≤λ−n|Tn(x)−Tn(y)|

and in fact

|Ti(x)−Ti(y)| ≤λ−(n−i)|Tn(x)−Tn(y)|.

(14)

Therefore we obtain log|DTn(x)|

|DTn(y)| = K

n

X

i=1

λ−(n−i)|Tn(x)−Tn(y)|

≤ K

λ−1|Tn(x)−Tn(y)| ≤logK0 for someK0∈(1,∞). This means that if A⊂Zn (so Tn:A→Tn(A) is a bijection), then

1 K0

m(A)

m(Zn) ≤ m(TnA)

m(TnZn) = m(TnA)

m(S1) ≤K0 m(A)

m(Zn), (2) wherem is Lebesgue measure.

(15)

Construct theT-invariant measure µ. TakeB ⊂ B arbitrary, and setµn(B) = 1nPn−1

i=0 m(T−iB). Then by (2), 1

K0m(B)≤µn(B)≤K0m(B).

We can take a weak limit of theµn's; call itµ. Then 1

K0m(B)≤µ(B)≤K0m(B),

and thereforeµ andmare equivalent. The T-invariance of µ proven in the same way as in the Theorem of Krylov-Bogul'ubov.

(16)

Now for the ergodicity ofµ, we need the Lebesgue Density Theorem, which says that ifm(A)>0, then for m-a.e. x∈A, the limit

ε→lim0

m(A∩Bε(x)) m(Bε(x)) =1,

whereBε(x) is theε-balls aroundx. Pointsx with this property are called(Lebesgue) density pointsof A. (In fact, the above also holds, ifBε(x)is just a one-sided ε-neighbourhood ofx.)

(17)

Assume by contradiction thatµis not ergodic. TakeA∈ B a T-invariant set such that µ(A)>0 andµ(Ac)>0. By equivalence ofµandm, alsoδ:=m(Ac)>0. Letx be a density point of A, andZn be a neighbourhood of x such that Tn:Zn→S1 is a bijection. Asn→ ∞,Zn→ {x}, and therefore we can choosen so large (henceZn so small) that

m(A∩Zn)

m(Zn) >1−δ/K0. Therefore m(Am(Zc∩Zn)n) < δ/K0, and using (2),

m(Tn(Ac∩Zn))

m(Tn(Zn)) ≤K0m(Ac∩Zn)

m(Zn) <K0δ/K0=δ.

SinceTn:Ac∩Zn→Ac is a bijection, and

m(TnZn) =m(S1) =1, we getδ=m(Ac)< δ, a contraction.

Thereforeµis ergodic.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

How does the scale factor evolve in time, if the universe is dominated by dust, photons or vacuum

How does the scale factor evolve in time, if the universe is dominated by dust, photons or vacuum

Orchestration allows states to participate in international regulation and delegate limited authority without incurring significant sovereignty costs; it allows IGOs to pursue

Water supply is given from one header tank (white container on top) for each treatment group, in which water is pre-gassed in accordance to the respective CO 2 treatment

Starting from a mean-field hamiltonian with pairing interaction, we use the generator coordi- nate method (GCM) and a generalized gaussian overlap approximation to derive

☛ As long as you are a minor (less than 18 years old) and have an Aufenthaltserlaubnis acording to the new residence right regulations (§ 25a Aufenthaltsgesetz), your parents and

The energy levels ǫ J,n of our molecule are enumerated by the angular momentum and the radial quantum number n.. To understand the structure of the low-lying energy levels we

In §4 we present our main result, namely, that a given Sonneveld pencil defines a one-dimensional family of purified pencils and a one-dimensional family of deflated pencils