• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram

Passed phone pre-screening;

presented for screening (n

t

= 159; n

m

=109; n

f

= 50)

Excluded (n

t

= 7; n

m

= 6; n

f

= 1)

 Declined to participate (nm = 6; nf = 1)

Analysed

For objective safety measures: all males who were randomized, received the intervention, and for whom measures were obtained

(n

m

< 49)

For adverse event/symptom reports:

all males who received the spray and completed at least one symptom assessment

(n

m

= 49)

Lost to follow-up (n

t

= 3; n

m

= 3; n

f

=0)

 Could not be reached (nm = 3)

Oxytocin (n

t

= 75; n

m

= 50; n

f

=25)

Received intervention (nt = 74; nm = 49; nf =25)

Did not receive intervention (nm = 1)

Lost to follow-up (n

t

= 6; n

m

= 6)

 Could not be reached (nm = 6)

Placebo (n

t

= 69; n

m

= 46; n

f

=23)

Received intervention (nt = 68; nm = 46; nf =22)

Did not receive intervention (nf =1)

Analysed

For objective safety measures: all males who were randomized, received the intervention, and for whom measures were obtained

(n

m

< 46)

For adverse event/symptom reports:

all males who received the spray and completed at least one symptom assessment

(n

m

= 44)

Allocation

Analysis Follow-Up

Randomized (n

t

= 144; n

m

= 96; n

f

=48)

Enrollment

Pre-Intervention Assessments

Excluded (n

t

= 8; n

m

= 7; n

f

=1)

 Withdrew participation (nm = 4; nf =1)

 Other reasons (nm = 3)

Discontinued intervention (n

t

= 1; n

m

= 1)

 Experience of adverse event (nm = 1)

Discontinued intervention (n

t

= 7; n

m

= 3; n

f

=4)

 Experience of adverse event (nm =2; nf =4)

 Unrelated medical issue (nm = 1)

Post-Intervention Assessments

Excluded (n

t

= 1; n

m

= 1)

Withdrew participation

(n

m

= 1)

Note: Subscripts t, f, and m, refer to total sample, females, and males, respectively.

Article: Safety and tolerability of chronic intranasal oxytocin in older men: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Journal: Psychopharmacology

Authors: Rung, J. M., Horta, M., Tammi, E. M., Perez, E., Ojeda, M. C., Lin, T., Harris, G., Somerville, J., Salmeron, D., Beltz, S.E., Sandesara, B., Feifel, D., & Ebner, N. C.

Corresponding Authors:

Natalie C. Ebner, University of Florida, Department of Psychology Email: natalie.ebner@ufl.edu

Jillian M. Rung, University of Florida, Departments of Epidemiology and Psychology Email: jrung@ufl.edu, rung.jillian@gmail.com

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Article: Safety and tolerability of chronic intranasal oxytocin in older men: Results from a randomized controlled trial..

[r]

In common, it included basic subjects of family and school relationships (parents, teachers, etc.), the basic phenomena of school life (good and bad appraisal, tests, etc.), events

We also did not observe ego depletion in our participants, but instead got a reverse effect: participants from self-control demanding condition performed at Stroop task better

Data from 113 men and 351 women were obtained on the Welsh Figure Preference Test (Welsh, 1987), the Art Experience Scale and the NEO Personality Inventory (Costa &amp; McCrae,

The current study uses the Riverside Situational Q-Sort (RSQ v 3.15; Wagerman &amp; Funder, 2009) in the Estonian student sample (n = 317), to investigate the

The results indicated, that the participants’ ratings of their behaviour were consistent across the four situations, also a single participant tended to be describe his or

We first confirmed that manipulation of task difficulty indeed had an expected effect on decision confidence, so that confidence ratings were on average lower in hard condition